Opinion
Argued May 20, 1926 —
Decided October 18, 1926.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 99.
For the appellant, Edward L. Katzenbach.
For the respondent, Whiting Moore.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, GARDNER, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 7.
For reversal — KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 4.