From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buford v. Haggie

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 8, 2007
1:02 cv 5313 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)

Opinion

1:02 cv 5313 OWW DLB P.

March 8, 2007

EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Attorney General of the State of California, DAVID S. CHANEY, Senior Assistant Attorney General, FRANCES T. GRUNDER, Senior Assistant Attorney General, DAVID A. CARRASCO, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, MEGAN R. O'CARROLL, State Bar No. 215479, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Carline, Hegge, Hill, Posner, and Schumacher.


ORDER


The Court has considered Defendant Hill's request for a two-week extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's interrogatories.

IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendant's request is granted. Defendant shall serve his responses to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions no later than March 22, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Buford v. Haggie

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 8, 2007
1:02 cv 5313 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Buford v. Haggie

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY BUFORD, Plaintiff, v. MTA HAGGIE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 8, 2007

Citations

1:02 cv 5313 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2007)