From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buford v. Haggie

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 30, 2007
1:02-cv-5313 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2007)

Opinion

1:02-cv-5313 OWW DLB P.

April 30, 2007

EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Attorney General of the State of California, DAVID S. CHANEY, Chief Assistant Attorney General, FRANCES T. GRUNDER, Senior Assistant Attorney General, DAVID A. CARRASCO, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, MEGAN R. O'CARROLL, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Attorneys for Defendants Carline, Hegge, Hill, Posner, and Schumacher.


ORDER


The Court has considered Defendants request for a two-week extension of time to reply to Plaintiff's opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss.

IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants' request is granted. Defendants shall serve their reply no later than May 10, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Buford v. Haggie

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 30, 2007
1:02-cv-5313 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2007)
Case details for

Buford v. Haggie

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY BUFORD, Plaintiff, v. MTA HAGGIE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 30, 2007

Citations

1:02-cv-5313 OWW DLB P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2007)