From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buford v. Bradley

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Sep 16, 2010
4:10CV01074 WRW-BD (E.D. Ark. Sep. 16, 2010)

Opinion

4:10CV01074 WRW-BD.

September 16, 2010


ORDER


The Court has received the Partial Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the recommendation, the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety.

Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Bradley, Murray, Hensley, Bascoe, and Hamms are DISMISSED without prejudice. In addition, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Durhman for denying him access to the courts and discriminating against him based on his race are DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of September, 2010.


Summaries of

Buford v. Bradley

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Sep 16, 2010
4:10CV01074 WRW-BD (E.D. Ark. Sep. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Buford v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:TONY BUFORD PLAINTIFF v. SCOTT BRADLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Sep 16, 2010

Citations

4:10CV01074 WRW-BD (E.D. Ark. Sep. 16, 2010)