From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bueno v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 2004
6 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-06009.

Decided April 19, 2004.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated June 13, 2003, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d).

David J. Tetlak (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for appellant.

Andrew J. Hirschhorn, Rosedale, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the subject motor vehicle accident ( see Toure v. Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 N.Y.2d 345; Gaddy v. Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955). The affirmation of the plaintiff's physician, submitted in opposition to the defendant's motion, failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

SANTUCCI, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bueno v. Coleman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 19, 2004
6 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Bueno v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BUENO, respondent, v. SANDY COLEMAN, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 19, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 875