Opinion
July 3, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Sherwood, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff provided sufficient admissible evidence from which a jury could infer that the defendants had permitted the existence of a slippery and dangerous condition, and that the condition had persisted for an extended period of time, to permit a jury to find that defendants should be charged with constructive notice thereof ( see, Morales v. Jollee Consolidators, 173 A.D.2d 315; Weisenthal v. Pickman, 153 A.D.2d 849). Summary judgment was therefore properly denied to the defendants.
We have examined the defendants' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.