From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buder v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. C 11-04955 JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 11-04955 JCS

10-18-2011

WAYNE BUDER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC., a California corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP James G. Snell (SBN 173070) Heather L. Shook (SBN 268716) Attorneys for Defendants Quicken Loans, Inc.


BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

James G. Snell (SBN 173070)

Heather L. Shook (SBN 268716)

Attorneys for Defendants

Quicken Loans, Inc.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

TO RESPOND TO INITIAL

COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-2 & 7-12)

Complaint served: September 9, 2011

Current response date: October 13, 2011

New response date: November 3, 2011

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Wayne Buder ("Plaintiff") filed this action, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, against Defendant Quicken Loans, Inc. ("Defendant") on September 6, 2011 in the Superior Court of California, County of Marin;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served his Complaint on Defendant on September 9, 2011;

WHEREAS, Bingham McCutchen LLP was recently obtained as counsel of record for Defendant and requires additional time to respond to the Complaint;

WHEREAS, Defendant removed this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on October 6, 2011;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c), the current date by which Defendant must respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is October 13, 2011;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to extend the time within which Defendant must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to November 3, 2011;

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. Defendant Quicken Loans, Inc. shall have until November 3, 2011 within which to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above-captioned matter.

BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP

By: James G. Snell

Attorneys for Defendant Quicken Loans, Inc.

PEARSON, SIMON, WARSHAW, & PENNY,

LLP

By: Daniel L. Warshaw

Attorneys for Plaintiff Buder, on behalf of himself and

all others similarly situated.

Judge Joseph C. Spero


Summaries of

Buder v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. C 11-04955 JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Buder v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE BUDER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 11-04955 JCS (N.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)