From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buczek v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 22, 2012
Case No. 3:12-cv-112-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-112-KRG-KAP

08-22-2012

SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK, Petitioner, v. CHARLES MAIORANA, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO, Respondent


Report and Recommendation

Petitioner's motion to reconsider, docket no. 6, is as silly as his original petition and should be denied.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S 636(b) (1), the petitioner is given notice that he has fourteen days to serve and file written objections to this Report and Recommendation.

___________

Keith A. Pesto,

United States Magistrate Judge
Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:

Shane C. Buczek, Reg No. 90656-111

F.C.I. Loretto

P.O. Box 1000

Loretto, PA 15940


Summaries of

Buczek v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 22, 2012
Case No. 3:12-cv-112-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Buczek v. Maiorana

Case Details

Full title:SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK, Petitioner, v. CHARLES MAIORANA, WARDEN, F.C.I…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-112-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Aug. 22, 2012)