From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buczek v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 7, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-112-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-112-KRG-KAP

09-07-2012

SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK, Petitioner, v. CHARLES MAIORANA, WARDEN, F.C.I. LORETTO, Respondent


MEMORANDUM ORDER

The petitioner's Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion, docket no. 6, was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b) (3), and Local Rule 72 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on August 22, 2012, docket no. 7, recommending that the motion be denied. The petitioner was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S 636(b)(1), he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Petitioner filed a pleading on August 30, 2012, that can be considered a timely objection. docket no. 8. It is meritless.

After de novo review of the record of this matter, together with the Report and Recommendation and the timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2012, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment, docket no. 6, is denied.

BY THE COURT:

___________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Notice by U.S. Mail to:

Shane C. Buczek, Reg No. 90656-111

F.C.I. Loretto

P.O. Box 1000

Loretto, PA 15940


Summaries of

Buczek v. Maiorana

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 7, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-112-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Buczek v. Maiorana

Case Details

Full title:SHANE CHRISTOPHER BUCZEK, Petitioner, v. CHARLES MAIORANA, WARDEN, F.C.I…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 7, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-112-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2012)