From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckwalter v. Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 3, 2008
598 Pa. 210 (Pa. 2008)

Opinion

No. 85 MAL 2008.

September 3, 2008.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 85 MAL 2008 from the Order of the Commonwealth Court.

Prior Report: Pa.Cmwlth., 940 A.2d 617.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Whether Baldwin v. City of Philadelphia, 99 Pa. 164, 1881 WL 13869 (1881), which held Pa. CONST. art. III, § 13, now § 27, did not apply to a municipal ordinance that changed a public officer's compensation mid-term, should be reversed.

(2) Whether Pa. CONST. art. III, § 27 prohibits mid-term compensation changes for elected municipal officers by means of a municipal ordinance.


Summaries of

Buckwalter v. Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Sep 3, 2008
598 Pa. 210 (Pa. 2008)
Case details for

Buckwalter v. Borough

Case Details

Full title:Kendrick BUCKWALTER, Petitioner v. BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 3, 2008

Citations

598 Pa. 210 (Pa. 2008)
955 A.2d 1014