From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Nov 24, 2015
477 S.W.3d 169 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102573

11-24-2015

Surron Buckley, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Christine K. Lesicko, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.


Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Christine K. Lesicko, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Surron Buckley appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Buckley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Nov 24, 2015
477 S.W.3d 169 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

Buckley v. State

Case Details

Full title:Surron Buckley, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Nov 24, 2015

Citations

477 S.W.3d 169 (E.D. Mo. 2015)