From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckley v. HDSP

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 10, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2474 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2474 DAD P.

May 10, 2011


ORDER


By order filed March 29, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Buckley v. HDSP

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 10, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2474 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Buckley v. HDSP

Case Details

Full title:JULES BUCKLEY, Plaintiff, v. HDSP et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 10, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2474 DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 10, 2011)