From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckley v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 31, 2022
2:22-cv-00896-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00896-GMN-NJK

08-31-2022

Keith Buckley, Plaintiff, v. Bank of America, NA, JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA, Defendants.

BALLARD SPAHR LLP Joel E. Tasca David E. Chavez Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase, NA. KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC David H. Krieger Shawn W. Miller Attorneys for Plaintiff.


BALLARD SPAHR LLP Joel E. Tasca David E. Chavez Attorneys for Defendant JPMorgan Chase, NA.

KRIEGER LAW GROUP, LLC David H. Krieger Shawn W. Miller Attorneys for Plaintiff.

FIFTH JOINT MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NA TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIFTH REQUEST)

The response of Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA (“Chase”) to Plaintiff Keith Buckley's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is due on August 30, 2022. Chase has requested, and Plaintiff has agreed, that Chase have up to and including September 7, 2022, to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties have made significant progress in their settlement discussions so far and are close to reaching an agreement in principle.

This is the fifth request for an extension, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Buckley v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Aug 31, 2022
2:22-cv-00896-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Buckley v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:Keith Buckley, Plaintiff, v. Bank of America, NA, JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-00896-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2022)