From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bucklew v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 13, 2010
690 S.E.2d 215 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

A09A2230.

DECIDED JANUARY 13, 2010. RECONSIDERATION DENIED FEBRUARY 11, 2010.

Stun belt. Gwinnett Superior Court. Before Judge Hamil. Sharon L. Hopkins, for appellant.

Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Richard A. Vandever, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Roger Bucklew appeals from his convictions for aggravated child molestation and child molestation. In his sole enumeration of error, Bucklew argues the trial court erred by ordering him to wear a stun belt during the trial. The record, however, shows that he did not object to the trial court's order. His counsel's "failure to object at trial renders any argument as to this issue waived." (Citation omitted.) Henderson v. State, 285 Ga. 240, 245 (7) ( 675 SE2d 28) (2009) (failure to object at trial to security measures ordered by trial court resulted in waiver of issue on appeal).

Judgment affirmed. Phipps, J., concurs. Bernes, J., concurs in the judgment only.


DECIDED JANUARY 13, 2010 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED FEBRUARY 11, 2010.


Summaries of

Bucklew v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 13, 2010
690 S.E.2d 215 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Bucklew v. State

Case Details

Full title:BUCKLEW v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 13, 2010

Citations

690 S.E.2d 215 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010)
302 Ga. App. 291