From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bucklew v. St. Clair

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 26, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2117-N (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2117-N

08-26-2020

SARAH BUCKLEW, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MATT ST. CLAIR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

The plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside Order Dismissing Case Based on New evidence, filed November 24, 2019 (doc. 62), is DENIED.

Signed August 26, 2020.

/s/_________

David C. Godbey

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bucklew v. St. Clair

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Aug 26, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2117-N (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2020)
Case details for

Bucklew v. St. Clair

Case Details

Full title:SARAH BUCKLEW, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER MATT ST. CLAIR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Aug 26, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-2117-N (N.D. Tex. Aug. 26, 2020)