From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckingham v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-124 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-124 Erie.

May 24, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This petition for writ of habeas corpus was received by the Clerk of Court on May 24, 2006 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. Ej 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on May 26, 2006 recommended that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail at SCI-Albion where he is incarcerated, and on Respondent. Petitioner has filed no objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report and Recommendation. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on May 24, 2006 is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Buckingham v. Brooks

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-124 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Buckingham v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. BUCKINGHAM, Petitioner, v. MARILYN BROOKS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 24, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-124 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 24, 2006)