From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buckels v. Pallone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1967
28 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

May 11, 1967

Appeal from the Onondaga Trial Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.


Judgment and order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and complaint dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The recorded restrictions do not prohibit the resubdivision of a lot, as long as the general restrictions are not violated. After dividing one lot, as laid out on a map for a planned subdivision, into two triangular lots, each was about 121 feet wide in front, 170 feet deep, and ran to the triangular apex at the rear. The structure and value of the house on the easterly lot, the lot area, and the location of the structure in relation to the lot lines are in complete accord with the recorded restrictions. The proposed use of the westerly lot also conforms with these restrictions, and we find no violation or proposed violation. It is unnecessary for us to reach any other question.


Summaries of

Buckels v. Pallone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 11, 1967
28 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Buckels v. Pallone

Case Details

Full title:DAVIS E. BUCKELS, Individually and as President of Treeland Circle Home…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 11, 1967

Citations

28 A.D.2d 636 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)