From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buck v. City of Highland Park

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 29, 2016
SC: 152192 (Mich. Mar. 29, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 152192

03-29-2016

CARLETON BUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, CURTIS WHITE, and JANE DOE, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

152192 & (61) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 320967
Wayne CC: 12-010985-NO

On order of the Court, the motion to amend is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 16, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 29, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Buck v. City of Highland Park

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 29, 2016
SC: 152192 (Mich. Mar. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Buck v. City of Highland Park

Case Details

Full title:CARLETON BUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, CURTIS…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 29, 2016

Citations

SC: 152192 (Mich. Mar. 29, 2016)