From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buchanan v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 27, 2013
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00271-MMD-(GWF) (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00271-MMD-(GWF)

02-27-2013

JAMES JEFFREY BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, a Political Subdivision of the STATE OF NEVADA; OFFICER SANDY RASCHKE, individually and as a police officer employed by the LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; THE CITY OF LAS VEGAS, BENJAMIN NADIG, ESQ., CHARCOTTE BIBLE, ESQ., EDWARD POLESKI, ROE CORPORATIONS and/or GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, and JOHN DOES I-X, inclusive, Defendants.

BRADFORD R. JERBIC City Attorney DAVID E. BAILEY Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for City Defendants JAMES JEFFREY BUCHANAN In Proper Person


BRADFORD R, JERBIC
City Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 1056
By: DAVID E. BAILEY
Deputy City Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 8955
495 S. Main Street, Sixth Floor
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 229-6629
(702) 386-1749 (fax)
Email: debailey@lasvegasnevada.gov
Attorneys for Defendants City of Las Vegas,
Benjamin Nadig, and Edward Poleski

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS CITY DEFENDANTS

COME NOW Defendants CITY OF LAS VEGAS, BENJAMIN NADIG, and EDWARD POLESKI (collectively referred to hereinafter as "City Defendants"), by and through their attorneys, BRADFORD R. JERBIC, City Attorney, by DAVID E. BAILEY, Deputy City Attorney; and Plaintiff, JAMES JEFFREY BUCHANAN, in proper person, and hereby agree and stipulate that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice as it pertains to each of Plaintiff's claims and/or causes of action against City Defendants, with each party to bear their own attorney fees and costs; hut that (he Court's Order dated February 15, 2013, in the above-captioned action concerning an award of attorney fees in favor of City Defendants (Docket #96) remains and shall not be affected by this Stipulation and Order. BRADFORD R. JERBIC
City Attorney
By: ___________

DAVID E. BAILEY

Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for City Defendants

_________________

JAMES JEFFREY BUCHANAN

In Proper Person

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation of the parties, each of Plaintiffs claims and causes of actions against each of Defendants CITY OF LAS VEGAS, BENJAMIN NADIG, and EDWARD POLESKI in the above-captioned action are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own costs and attorneys fees; but the Court's Order dated February 15, 2013, in the above-captioned action concerning an award of attorney fees in favor of City Defendants (Docket #96) remains and shall not be affected by this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
SUBMITTED BY: BRADFORD R. JERBIC
City Attorney
By: _________________

DAVID E. BAILEY

Deputy City Attorney

Nevada Bar No. 8955

495 S. Main Street, Sixth Floor

Las Vegas, NV 89101

Attorneys for City Defendants


Summaries of

Buchanan v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 27, 2013
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00271-MMD-(GWF) (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Buchanan v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:JAMES JEFFREY BUCHANAN, Plaintiff, v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-00271-MMD-(GWF) (D. Nev. Feb. 27, 2013)