Buccilli v. Foster & Garbus, LLP

3 Citing cases

  1. Byrnes v. Eltman Law, P.C.

    CV 18-1485 (ADS) (AKT) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 22, 2019)   Cited 3 times
    Finding that service of process via Secretary of State was valid upon corporate defendant where affidavit of service demonstrated delivery of two copies of summons and complaint, along with fee of $40.00

    In turn, "Section 1692g requires that 'within five days after the initial communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt, a debt collector shall, unless the following information is contained in the initial communication or the consumer has paid the debt, send the consumer a written notice containing . . . the amount of the debt.'" Buccilli v. Foster & Garbus, LLP, No. 17-CV-7498, 2019 WL 1208792, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2019) (emphasis in oringal) (quoting 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692g(a)(1)).

  2. Morris Motel, LLC v. Dechance

    20-CV-3350 (RPK) (AYS) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    Because this alternative theory was not presented in plaintiff's complaint, I decline to address it. Mosby v. Bd. of Educ. City of Norwalk, 754 Fed.Appx. 34, 37 (2d Cir. 2018); Buccilli v. Foster & Garbus, LLP, No. 17-CV-7498 (SFJ) (AYS), 2019 WL 1208792, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2019). II. The Town Is Entitled To Summary Judgment On Plaintiff's Takings Claim.

  3. Musante v. Forster & Garbus, L.L.P.

    19-cv-440 (SJF) (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 12, 2020)

    That interpretation has been rejected in this District, including by this Court in addressing the exact same language used by F&G. See Buccilli v. Foster & Garbus, LLP, No. 17-cv-7498, 2019 WL 1208792, at * (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2019). Plaintiffs' challenge to the safe harbor language fails for the same reasons this Court previously set forth in Buccilli.