From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bucalos v. Schubert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

July, 1916.


Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the finding by the jury that the operator of the car was engaged in the business of the master at the time of the casualty is contrary to the evidence. Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Bucalos v. Schubert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1916
174 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Bucalos v. Schubert

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH BUCALOS, Respondent, v. BERNHARD SCHUBERT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1916

Citations

174 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)