From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bucalo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 14, 1993
189 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

January 14, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene L. Nardelli, J.).


There are material issues of fact with respect to the control or special use of the sidewalk where plaintiff slipped and fell. Even absent evidence that defendant hotel repaired the walk-way or curb in question, issues of fact exist, which include whether the part of the sidewalk where the accident occurred was constructed or used exclusively to benefit the hotel, to the extent that a duty arose to maintain it in a reasonably safe condition by virtue of a special use or benefit (see, Nickelsburg v. City of New York, 263 App. Div. 625, 626; Balsam v Delma Eng'g Corp., 139 A.D.2d 292, 298-299, lv denied in part and dismissed in part 73 N.Y.2d 783).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Bucalo v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 14, 1993
189 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Bucalo v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARLENE BUCALO et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 14, 1993

Citations

189 A.D.2d 656 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Boston Props.

While McMahon testified that Citigroup Center Condominium did not have an office at the premises, he also…