Opinion
Civil Action 20-4719
01-13-2022
BSD-360, LLC d/b/a THE GODDARD SCHOOL, Plaintiff v. PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, United States District Judge.
AND NOW, this 13 day of January, 2022, upon consideration of Defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company's ("PIIC") Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 17), Plaintiff BSD-360, LLC d/b/a The Goddard School's ("Goddard") Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 22) and Amended Response (Doc. No. 23), PIIC's Reply (Doc. No, 34), Goddard's Sur-Reply (Doc. No. 35), and Goddard's Supplemental Briefing (Doc. No. 46), it is ORDERED that Defendant PIIC's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 17) is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Memorandum.
And upon consideration of Defendant Specht Insurance Group, LTD's ("Specht") Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 40), Goddard's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 42), Specht's Reply (Doc. No. 47), and Specht's Supplemental Briefing (Doc. No. 49), it is ORDERED that Defendant Specht's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 40) is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Memorandum.