From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brzozowski v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 2002
297 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-09779

Submitted September 3, 2002.

September 24, 2002.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of an insurance policy, the defendant Allstate Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.), dated September 10, 2001, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Bruno, Gerbino Soriano, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Steven D. Brower of counsel), for appellant.

Stephen David Fink, Forest Hills, N.Y., for respondent.

Troisi Markowitz, Jericho, N.Y. (Michael A. Troisi of counsel), for defendant third-party plaintiff Allbest Insurance Agency AIA Assoc.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff leased a vehicle and obtained automobile insurance, including theft coverage, from the appellant. The vehicle was allegedly stolen, but the appellant disclaimed coverage on grounds which are not relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff then commenced this action, among other things, to recover on the policy. The vehicle was ultimately recovered nearly two years after the alleged theft. The appellant subsequently moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, contending that it had no liability under the terms of the policy because the vehicle was recovered with minimal damage.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the appellant did not establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. If it is ultimately determined that the appellant breached the contract of insurance by improperly disclaiming coverage, the appellant may be liable under the policy for the plaintiff's loss because the vehicle was not recovered within a reasonable time after the alleged theft (see Oppenheimer v. Baker Williams, 225 A.D. 58, 60). Consequently, the appellant's motion was properly denied.

ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brzozowski v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 2002
297 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Brzozowski v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BRZOZOWSKI, respondent, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 24, 2002

Citations

297 A.D.2d 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
747 N.Y.S.2d 538