From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryson v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 2014
Case No. 11-20571 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 11-20571

02-03-2014

MICHAEL ALLEN BRYSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


Honorable Thomas L. Ludington


ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE

On January 15, 2014, Michael Bryson filed a motion for an order to "Re-Open, Amend and Supplement" his motion to vacate his sentence. See Pet'r's Mot., ECF No. 30. Although Bryson alleges that he brings the motion pursuant to both Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 and Rule 60, id. at 1, the Sixth Circuit has established that a district court "lacks power" to grant a Rule 15 motion "unless postjudgment relief is granted" first. See In re Ferro Corp. Derivative Litigation, 511 F.3d 611, 624 (6th Cir. 2008) (brackets omitted) (quoting Acevedo-Villalobos v. Hernandez, 22 F.3d 384, 389 (1st Cir. 1994)); see also Morse v. McWhorter, 290 F.3d 795, 799 (6th Cir. 2002) ("Following entry of final judgment a party may not seek to amend . . . without first moving to alter, set aside or vacate judgment pursuant to either Rule 59 or Rule 60"). Thus, Bryson's motion will be considered only under Rule 60.

In any event, a response from the government is necessary to adjudicate the matter. One of Bryson's arguments is that penalty enhancement information was filed after he had already pleaded guilty, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 851(a)(1) ("No person who stands convicted of an offense under this part shall be sentenced to increased punishment . . . unless . . . before entry of a plea of guilty, the United States attorney files an information with the court . . . stating in writing the previous convictions to be relied upon."). And, the docket seems to substantiate his claim: Bryson pleaded guilty on January 17, 2012, but the notice of penalty enhancement was not filed until March 27, 2012.

The government must respond. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the government is DIRECTED to file a response to Bryson's motion no later than February 14, 2014.

__________________________

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON

United States District Judge

PROOF OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means and upon Michael Allen Bryson #46147-039 Gilmer Federal Correctional Institution, Inmate Mail/Parcels, P.O. Box 6000 Glenville, WV 26351 by first class U.S. mail on February 3, 2014.

__________________________

TRACY A. JACOBS


Summaries of

Bryson v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Feb 3, 2014
Case No. 11-20571 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Bryson v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ALLEN BRYSON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 2014

Citations

Case No. 11-20571 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 3, 2014)