Opinion
21-1674
11-04-2022
MATTHEW BRYSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMPUCOM SYSTEMS, INC.; DOES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive, Defendants - Appellees.
Matthew Bryson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Douglas Dellinger, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: September 30, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:19-cv-01121-CCE-JEP)
Matthew Bryson, Appellant Pro Se.
Stephen Douglas Dellinger, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Bryson appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant and denying Bryson's postjudgment motion in his employment discrimination action.[*] We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. Bryson v. CompuCom Sys., Inc., No. 1:19-cv-01121-CCE-JEP (M.D. N.C. June 15, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
[*] Bryson has not challenged in his informal brief the district court's order denying his postjudgment motion to amend. As such, he has forfeited review of the order. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014).