From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Aug 29, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2011-188054 (S.C. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-188054 Memorandum Opinion No. 2012-MO-034

08-29-2012

Curtis Bryant, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of the South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mary Shannon Williams, all of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Dorchester County

Diane S. Goodstein, Trial Judge

Edgar W. Dickson, Post-Conviction Relief Judge


APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of the South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Mary Shannon Williams, all of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his application for post-conviction relief (PCR). Because there is sufficient evidence to support the PCR judge's finding that petitioner did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we grant certiorari as to Question I of the petition, dispense with further briefing, and proceed with a review of the direct appeal issue pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986). We deny the petition for a writ of certiorari as to petitioner's Question II. Counsel for petitioner has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a petition to be relieved as counsel. Petitioner has filed a pro se response. After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders, supra, we dismiss the appeal and grant the petition to be relieved as counsel.

DISMISSED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bryant v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Aug 29, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2011-188054 (S.C. Aug. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Bryant v. State

Case Details

Full title:Curtis Bryant, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2011-188054 (S.C. Aug. 29, 2012)