From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 11, 1998
723 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-3555

Opinion filed December 11, 1998. JULY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Warren Burk and Edward J. Richardson, Judges.

Daniel S. Ciener and David J. Romett and Andy M. Fouche' of Law Firm of Daniel S. Ciener, Merritt Island, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kelli R. Orndorff and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


James Paul Bryant appeals from the denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because the error asserted would have required trial counsel to take a position in direct conflict with then controlling case law in this district and would also have required the trial attorney to move for discharge pursuant to Florida's "speedy trial" rule while knowing that he was unprepared for trial, we agree with the trial judge that Bryant's attorney was not ineffective and affirm.

State v. Williams, 597 So.2d 960 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992),quashed, 622 So.2d 477 (Fla. 1993).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 11, 1998
723 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Bryant v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PAUL BRYANT, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 11, 1998

Citations

723 So. 2d 878 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Gendron v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corrs.

The Defendant demands speedy at the same time he requests his counsel to perform depositions and investigate…