From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 11, 1990
559 So. 2d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

In Bryant v. State, 559 So.2d 414 (Fla.Dist.App.1990), the court affirmed the defendant's convictions of possession of drug paraphernalia (a pipe) and possession of cocaine found in that pipe.

Summary of this case from State v. Hill

Opinion

No. 88-02740.

April 11, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, W. Douglas Baird, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Because we agree with the majority decision in Evans v. State, 543 So.2d 326 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), that separate convictions for possession of drug paraphernalia (a pipe) and possession of cocaine found in that pipe do not violate Carawan v. State, 515 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1987), we affirm appellant's convictions and sentences for possession of drug paraphernalia and cocaine.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bryant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 11, 1990
559 So. 2d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

In Bryant v. State, 559 So.2d 414 (Fla.Dist.App.1990), the court affirmed the defendant's convictions of possession of drug paraphernalia (a pipe) and possession of cocaine found in that pipe.

Summary of this case from State v. Hill
Case details for

Bryant v. State

Case Details

Full title:GLORIA BRYANT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 11, 1990

Citations

559 So. 2d 414 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

State v. Hill

There is authority from other jurisdictions which holds that convictions for both possession of cocaine and…