From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryant v. Maury Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mar 10, 2020
1:20CV208 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2020)

Opinion

1:20CV208

03-10-2020

RANDY BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. MAURY CORRECTIONAL INST., Defendant(s).


ORDER AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of North Carolina, submitted what the Court treated as a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on allegedly improper dental treatment and discrimination. The form of the Complaint is such that serious flaws make it impossible to further process the Complaint. The problems are: 1. The filing fee was not received nor was a proper affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis submitted, with sufficient information completed or signed by Plaintiff, to permit review. 2. The Complaint is not on forms prescribed for use by this Court, nor is the information requested by such forms and necessary to process the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A contained in Plaintiff's submission. See LR 7.1(d).

Consequently, the Complaint should be dismissed, but without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects of the present Complaint. To the extent Plaintiff chooses to file a new Complaint, the Court also notes that it appears that the potential defendants may be located in the Eastern District of North Carolina, where Plaintiff is housed. The events challenged in the Complaint appear to have occurred there as well. Therefore, it appears that venue would be proper in that District, and Plaintiff may obtain forms and instructions from the Clerk's Office for filing in that District. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The address is: 310 New Bern Avenue, Room 574, Raleigh, NC 27601

In forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that in forma pauperis status is granted for the sole purpose of entering this Order and Recommendation.

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be filed and dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms and in the proper district, which corrects the defects cited above.

This, the 10th day of March, 2020.

/s/_________

Joe L. Webster

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Bryant v. Maury Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Mar 10, 2020
1:20CV208 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Bryant v. Maury Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:RANDY BRYANT, Plaintiff, v. MAURY CORRECTIONAL INST., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Mar 10, 2020

Citations

1:20CV208 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 10, 2020)