Opinion
23-2056
08-01-2024
ANTHONY G. BRYANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AT&T CORPORATION; CRICKET WIRELESS; META CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellees.
Anthony G. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: July 30, 2024
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (2:23-cv-03967-JD-SVH)
Anthony G. Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony G. Bryant appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Bryant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950) (per curiam) (holding that order denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis is appealable interlocutory order). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Bryant v. AT&T Corp., No. 2:23-cv-03967-JD-SVH (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 2023). We deny as moot Bryant's motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED