Opinion
CASE NO: 8:08-cv-794-T-23EAJ.
October 27, 2008
ORDER
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 6.01(b), the court referred (Doc. 33) the pro se plaintiff's motions (Docs. 20, 30) for entry of final judgment to the United States Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation. Following the Magistrate Judge's October 10, 2008, report (Doc. 43), the plaintiff objects (Doc. 44).
A de novo determination of those portions of the report and recommendation to which the plaintiff objects reveals that the objections either are unfounded or otherwise require no different resolution of the motion. Accordingly, the plaintiff's objections (Doc. 44) are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 43) is ADOPTED. The plaintiff's motions (Docs. 20, 30) for entry of final judgment are DENIED. On or before Friday, November 14, 2008, the plaintiff may amend the complaint.
ORDERED.