From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryan v. Countrywide Home Loans

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Oct 27, 2008
CASE NO: 8:08-cv-794-T-23EAJ (M.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO: 8:08-cv-794-T-23EAJ.

October 27, 2008


ORDER


Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 6.01(b), the court referred (Doc. 33) the pro se plaintiff's motions (Docs. 20, 30) for entry of final judgment to the United States Magistrate Judge for a report and recommendation. Following the Magistrate Judge's October 10, 2008, report (Doc. 43), the plaintiff objects (Doc. 44).

A de novo determination of those portions of the report and recommendation to which the plaintiff objects reveals that the objections either are unfounded or otherwise require no different resolution of the motion. Accordingly, the plaintiff's objections (Doc. 44) are OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 43) is ADOPTED. The plaintiff's motions (Docs. 20, 30) for entry of final judgment are DENIED. On or before Friday, November 14, 2008, the plaintiff may amend the complaint.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bryan v. Countrywide Home Loans

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Oct 27, 2008
CASE NO: 8:08-cv-794-T-23EAJ (M.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2008)
Case details for

Bryan v. Countrywide Home Loans

Case Details

Full title:PEARL LANIER BRYAN, Plaintiff, v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Oct 27, 2008

Citations

CASE NO: 8:08-cv-794-T-23EAJ (M.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2008)

Citing Cases

Funkhouser v. Stancil

His motion is therefore denied for failure to comply with the Local Rules. See Restorative Care of Am., Inc.…

Ellis v. Warner

"Where mail fraud is asserted as a predicate act for a civil RICO claim, a plaintiff must establish not only…