From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryan v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 1, 2007
No. CIV S-03-1702 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-1702 DFL EFB P.

March 1, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appointment counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's January 22, 2007, motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Bryan v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 1, 2007
No. CIV S-03-1702 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Bryan v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. BRYAN, Petitioner, v. TOM CAREY, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 1, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-03-1702 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2007)