From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bryan v. Bradley

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1800
1 N.C. 177 (N.C. Super. 1800)

Opinion

Fall Term, 1800.

If the writ be altered from debt to case, the bail is no longer bound.

Scire facias on a bail bond. Plea, nul tiel record. The writ had been originally issued in debt, and, in conformity therewith, the sheriff had taken the bail bond. In the county court the writ had been altered from debt to case, to which latter action the subsequent (178) proceedings corresponded. For the defendant it was argued that these variances were fatal; and,


The bail can be made liable in no other manner than as they have stipulated by their bond. In this case it is conditioned to be void if the principal appears to answer to an action of debt, which the plaintiff hath instituted against him; but a different action from this is afterwards prosecuted; consequently, the condition of the bond is not broken. The bail can say with truth, non haec in foedera venimus.

Whereupon the plaintiff's motion for the scire facias was quashed.

Cited: Smith v. Shaw, 30 N.C. 235; Bradhurst v. Pearson, 32 N.C. 56.


Summaries of

Bryan v. Bradley

Superior Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1800
1 N.C. 177 (N.C. Super. 1800)
Case details for

Bryan v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:BRYAN v. BRADLEY ET AL., BAIL OF DONALDSON. — Tayl., 77

Court:Superior Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1800

Citations

1 N.C. 177 (N.C. Super. 1800)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Shaw

The defendant, then, had no opportunity of putting in any plea by which the question of his discharge, on…

Bradhurst v. Pearson

This is true, and for the reason that after the alteration the action ceases to be the one to which the bail…