From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruzzone v. Intel Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 21, 2016
No. 14-17003 (9th Cir. Nov. 21, 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-17003

11-21-2016

MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTEL CORPORATION; ARM, INC., Defendants-Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 3:14-cv-01279-WHA MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Michael A. Bruzzone appeals pro se from the district court's judgment in his action alleging a conspiracy to defraud the federal and state governments and the public. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Stoner v. Santa Clara Cty. Office of Educ., 502 F.3d 1116, 1120-21 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.

The district court properly struck Bruzzone's complaint and dismissed the action because Bruzzone improperly attempted to proceed pro se as a relator in a qui tam action alleging a conspiracy to defraud the United States. See id. at 1125-27 (concluding that pro se litigants may not prosecute claims based on fraud against the Unites States).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Bruzzone's recusal motion because Bruzzone's allegations of bias were exclusively based on adverse judicial rulings. See Jorgensen v. Cassiday, 320 F.3d 906, 911 (9th Cir. 2003) (setting forth standard of review); see also Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994) (explaining that "judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion").

Defendants' unopposed motion for judicial notice, filed February 20, 2015, is granted.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Bruzzone v. Intel Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Nov 21, 2016
No. 14-17003 (9th Cir. Nov. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Bruzzone v. Intel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. BRUZZONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTEL CORPORATION; ARM, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Nov 21, 2016

Citations

No. 14-17003 (9th Cir. Nov. 21, 2016)