From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1930
230 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

October, 1930.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ.


Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Stay granted for thirty days to enable appellant to apply to the Court of Appeals.


Summaries of

Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1930
230 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Brustein v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL BRUSTEIN, Respondent, v. NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1930

Citations

230 App. Div. 844 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)