From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brush v. Brittain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 1960
10 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

January 28, 1960


Order unanimously reversed on the facts and on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the motion to examine the defendants-appellants before trial is denied, with $10 costs. Although the complaint is verified it consists for the most part of generalized charges and conclusory allegations. The papers offered in support of the motion do not contain factual allegations of evidentiary value to establish charges of wrongdoing or improper conduct (see Van Aalten v. Mack, 7 A.D.2d 289; Price v. Groves, 258 App. Div. 35), nor are special circumstances shown which warrant such examination. (New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, rule XI, subd. 7; see Van Aalten v. Mack, supra.)

Concur — Rabin, J.P., M.M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.


Summaries of

Brush v. Brittain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 28, 1960
10 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Brush v. Brittain

Case Details

Full title:GRAHAM M. BRUSH, SR., Individually and as a Stockholder of SEATRAIN LINES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 28, 1960

Citations

10 A.D.2d 574 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

Gearing v. Kelly

Order for examination before trial entered on May 31, 1961, reversed on the law and on the facts, with $20…