Summary
In Brunswick Corp. v. Cobalt Boats, LLC, 696 F. App'x 1021 (Fed. Cir. 2017), an appeal from an inter partes review ("IPR") proceeding, we affirmed without opinion the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision that claim 1 was shown to be unpatentable, but claims 4 and 5 were not.
Summary of this case from Cobalt Boats, LLC v. Brunswick Corp.Opinion
2017-1065
09-07-2017
BRUNSWICK CORPORATION, SEA RAY BOATS, INC., Appellants v. COBALT BOATS, LLC, Appellee
JASON C. WHITE, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by SCOTT D. SHERWIN; WILLIAM R. PETERSON, Houston, TX; JULIE S. GOLDEMBERG, Pittsburgh, PA; DAVID M. MORRIS, Washington, DC; CHRISTOPER REAGAN LIRO, AARON T. OLEJNICZAK, Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP, Milwaukee, WI. PENNY R. SLICER, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Kansas City, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY SCOTT EIDSON, SAMIR RAMESH MEHTA, St. Louis, MO.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2015-01060.
JUDGMENT
JASON C. WHITE, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellants. Also represented by SCOTT D. SHERWIN; WILLIAM R. PETERSON, Houston, TX; JULIE S. GOLDEMBERG, Pittsburgh, PA; DAVID M. MORRIS, Washington, DC; CHRISTOPER REAGAN LIRO, AARON T. OLEJNICZAK, Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP, Milwaukee, WI. PENNY R. SLICER, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Kansas City, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY SCOTT EIDSON, SAMIR RAMESH MEHTA, St. Louis, MO. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 7, 2017
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court