From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brunson v. McCorkle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 13, 2013
No. 11cv1018 JCH/LAM (D.N.M. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11cv1018 JCH/LAM

02-13-2013

FORREST BRUNSON, et al., Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER MCCORKLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS

AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Lourdes A. Martínez' Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 70), filed on January 4, 2012. No party has filed objections to the proposed findings and recommended disposition and the deadline for filing objections has passed. The Court has determined that it will adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 70) and grant in part and deny in part without prejudice Plaintiffs' Motion for Discovery Sanctions (Doc. 58).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (Doc. 70) are ADOPTED by the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Discovery Sanctions (Doc. 58) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part without prejudice as set forth in the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

HONORABLE JUDITH C. HERRERA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brunson v. McCorkle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 13, 2013
No. 11cv1018 JCH/LAM (D.N.M. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Brunson v. McCorkle

Case Details

Full title:FORREST BRUNSON, et al., Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER MCCORKLE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

No. 11cv1018 JCH/LAM (D.N.M. Feb. 13, 2013)