From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruno's, Inc. v. Bruner

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 1, 2002
805 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 1D00-3181

Opinion filed February 1, 2002.

An appeal from an order of Judge of Compensation Claims C. Douglas Brown.

Curt L. Harbsmeier and Claude M. Harden, III of Harbsmeier, Dezayas, Appel Hernandez, LLP, Lakeland; Susan W. Fox and Brendan M. Lee of MacFarlane Ferguson McMullen, Tampa for Appellants/Cross-Appellees.

Loren E. Levy of The Levy Law Firm, Tallahassee; Sean Culliton of Anderson, Culliton, Sullivan, P.A., Tallahassee for Appellee/Cross-Appellant.


We find no error in the award of temporary partial disability benefits and therefore reject the argument made in the main appeal. However, we conclude that the claimant has shown reversible error as to the issue presented in the cross appeal. The claimant is entitled to an award of penalties, because the evidence supporting the claim of temporary partial disability benefits was available to the employer and carrier at the time they declined payment. See Eastern Indus., Inc. v. Burnham, 750 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

PADOVANO, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Bruno's, Inc. v. Bruner

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 1, 2002
805 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Bruno's, Inc. v. Bruner

Case Details

Full title:BRUNO'S, INC./FOOD WORLD and ITT-SPECIALTY RISK SERVICES, INC.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 1, 2002

Citations

805 So. 2d 1090 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Shaw v. Florida Steel Corp.

We reverse the denial of penalties on the indemnity benefits awarded because the employer and carrier neither…

Dollar General v. McCoy

The denial of penalties was erroneous because the employer/self-insured neither paid the benefits within…