From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruno v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 25, 1981
395 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. ZZ-209.

March 25, 1981.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Duval County, Ralph W. Nimmons, Jr., J.

Michael Edward Bruno, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Bruno's appeal from an order denying his Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief urges that a split sentence committing him to the Department of Corrections for five years, three to be served by imprisonment, followed by two on probation, is unlawfully equivalent to a sentence of probation for five years on condition that the subject serve three years in prison. Villery v. Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla. 1980). We disagree. See Hollingsworth v. State, 394 So.2d 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

AFFIRMED.

McCORD and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bruno v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 25, 1981
395 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Bruno v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL EDWARD BRUNO, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 25, 1981

Citations

395 So. 2d 631 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Rita v. State

Surely he was then being restrained in custody just as much as if he were serving the thirty days in jail…