From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brummer v. Van Cleve Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1907
55 Misc. 227 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)

Opinion

June, 1907.

John L. Lockwood, for appellant.

Eugene Cohn, for respondent.


This is an action to recover damages for the breach of an advertising contract. During the progress of the trial, two exhibits, respectively eleven and twelve, relating to the suit on trial, were offered in evidence and appeared to be in the Spanish language. Defendant's counsel objected to the admission of these exhibits upon the ground that they were in a foreign language and not translated. The objection was overruled and the exhibits admitted, to which exception was taken. In Squadrilli v. Ciervo, 101 N.Y.S. 661, this court held that causes should be tried altogether in the English language, reversing a judgment rendered where some of the exhibits were in the French language. Because of this error, it is needless to consider any other question in the case.

Present: GILDERSLEEVE, SEABURY and PLATZEK, JJ.

Judgment reversed and record returned to be filed for amendment.


Summaries of

Brummer v. Van Cleve Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1907
55 Misc. 227 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)
Case details for

Brummer v. Van Cleve Co.

Case Details

Full title:LEON BRUMMER, Respondent, v . THE GEORGE B. VAN CLEVE COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1907

Citations

55 Misc. 227 (N.Y. App. Term 1907)
105 N.Y.S. 8