From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brugos v. Nannenga

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division
Oct 26, 2005
Cause No. 2:03-CV-547 RM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 26, 2005)

Opinion

Cause No. 2:03-CV-547 RM.

October 26, 2005


OPINION AND ORDER


On October 21, the plaintiff's responded to the court's order to show cause why the claims against Mr. and Mrs. Nannenga should not be stayed and severed. This court has no authority to lift the automatic stay imposed by 11 U.S.C. § 362, and while the plaintiffs unhelpfully devote considerable space to the disparagement of the reasons behind the bankruptcy filing, they have offered no persuasive argument against severing the Nannengas' claims, allowing the remainder of this litigation to continue. If, as the plaintiffs predict, the bankruptcy court lifts the stay, the plaintiffs may ask the court to vacate today's severance order.

Therefore, the court ORDERS all claims asserted against the Nannengas SEVERED and STAYED pending further order of the court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brugos v. Nannenga

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division
Oct 26, 2005
Cause No. 2:03-CV-547 RM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 26, 2005)
Case details for

Brugos v. Nannenga

Case Details

Full title:JOHN D. BRUGOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GERRY NANNENGA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Hammond Division

Date published: Oct 26, 2005

Citations

Cause No. 2:03-CV-547 RM (N.D. Ind. Oct. 26, 2005)