From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brugno v. Meiselman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

November, 1928.


Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The order was improperly made for the reason that its effect is to bring in a new party — a defendant who has not been brought into court in this action. ( Gray v. Vought Co., 216 App. Div. 230. ) Rich, Young, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur. Lazansky, P.J., dissents.


Summaries of

Brugno v. Meiselman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1928
225 App. Div. 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Brugno v. Meiselman

Case Details

Full title:ROCCO BRUGNO, Respondent, v. "JACOB" MEISELMAN, First Name "Jacob" Being…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1928

Citations

225 App. Div. 686 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)