From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruckert-Holland v. Rand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1996
234 A.D.2d 95 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 10, 1996.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stephen Crane, J.), entered on July 11, 1995, which denied defendant's motion for a change of venue to Essex County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


The motion was properly denied, defendant having failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR 511 (b) necessary to preserve his right to a change of venue under CPLR 510 (1). Further, defendant offered no other reason for changing venue except his own inconvenience, which showing was patently insufficient ( see, Rosenthal v Bologna, 211 AD2d 436, 437; Cardona v Aggressive Heating, 180 AD2d 572, 573; Coles v La-Guardia Med. Group, 161 AD2d 166).


Summaries of

Bruckert-Holland v. Rand

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 10, 1996
234 A.D.2d 95 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Bruckert-Holland v. Rand

Case Details

Full title:FRANK BRUCKERT-HOLLAND, Respondent, v. DONALD RAND, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 10, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 95 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 233