From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruck v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1916
114 N.E. 1061 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued December 5, 1916

Decided December 28, 1916

Amos Van Etten for appellant.

N. Frank O'Reilly, John T. Loughran and William H. Grogan for respondent.


Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Trial Term affirmed, on the dissenting opinion of SMITH, P.J., below, with costs in the Appellate Division and in this court.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Bruck v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 28, 1916
114 N.E. 1061 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Bruck v. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. BRUCK, as Executrix of FRANK J. BRUCK, Deceased, Respondent, v …

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 28, 1916

Citations

114 N.E. 1061 (N.Y. 1916)
114 N.E. 1061

Citing Cases

Matter of Finkelstein

The extinguishment of the cause of action by the delivery of the release did not however oust the court of…

Davis v. N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.

The sole beneficiary of the trust was in this instance the widow (Code Civ. Pro. sec. 1903), who, after…