From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruce v. Woll Bros.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 13, 1960
170 N.E.2d 402 (N.Y. 1960)

Opinion

Argued October 5, 1960

Decided October 13, 1960

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, FELIX C. BENVENGA, J.

Isaac C. Donner and Lazaar Henkin for appellant.

Harry Stackell for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs. The landlord was privileged under the judgment in the form appealed from to make whatever decorations, repairs, alterations or improvements or additions as were permitted by paragraph 13 in the lease, provided the store frontage or display window as installed by the tenant pursuant to paragraph 39 of the lease was not affected or impaired. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE and FOSTER.


Summaries of

Bruce v. Woll Bros.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 13, 1960
170 N.E.2d 402 (N.Y. 1960)
Case details for

Bruce v. Woll Bros.

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD BRUCE, Respondent, v. WOLL BROS., INC., Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 13, 1960

Citations

170 N.E.2d 402 (N.Y. 1960)
170 N.E.2d 402
207 N.Y.S.2d 266

Citing Cases

80 Broad Street v. Plazastraw

Indeed, provision is made for a rent abatement. Similarly, Bruce v. Woll Bros., Inc., 8 N.Y.2d 1052 (1960),…