From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruce v. Kaufman

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 6, 2024
5:24-cv-01807-SSS-AS (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2024)

Opinion

5:24-cv-01807-SSS-AS

12-06-2024

Marquice Bruce, Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. Veronica Kaufman, Defendants/Respondents.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL OR REMAND

Sunshine S. Sykes, United States District Judge

The Court previously received from [X] Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) [ ] Defendant(s)/Respondent(s):

[ ] an IFP Request with no accompanying Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal.

[X] a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal without an accompanying IFP Request - or payment of the filing fees.

[ ] a Complaint/Petition/Notice of Removal with a partial filing fee payment for an amount less than the full fee.

The Court sent a warning letter to [X] Plaintiff(s)/Petitioner(s) [ ] Defendant(s)/Respondent(s) advising that failure to correct this deficiency within THIRTY DAYS from the date of the warning letter would result in dismissal or remand of this case. More than THIRTY DAYS have now passed, and the deficiency has not been corrected.

Accordingly, this case is HEREBY ORDERED

[X] DISMISSED without prejudice.

[ ] REMANDED to the ________.


Summaries of

Bruce v. Kaufman

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 6, 2024
5:24-cv-01807-SSS-AS (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Bruce v. Kaufman

Case Details

Full title:Marquice Bruce, Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. Veronica Kaufman…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 6, 2024

Citations

5:24-cv-01807-SSS-AS (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2024)