From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bruce v. Fenske

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Mar 19, 2013
Civil No. 4:11-cv-4106 (W.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No. 4:11-cv-4106

03-19-2013

JAY BRUCE, JR. PLAINTIFF v. T. FENSKE, Correctional Officer, Texarkana Work Release Center DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed February 27, 2013, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 59). Judge Bryant recommends that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) be granted and that this case be dismissed without prejudice. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's Motions to Demonstrate (ECF Nos. 37 & 50), which Judge Bryant construed as responses to the Motion for Summary Judgment, are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 19th day of March, 2013.

________________________

Susan O. Hickey

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bruce v. Fenske

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
Mar 19, 2013
Civil No. 4:11-cv-4106 (W.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Bruce v. Fenske

Case Details

Full title:JAY BRUCE, JR. PLAINTIFF v. T. FENSKE, Correctional Officer, Texarkana…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION

Date published: Mar 19, 2013

Citations

Civil No. 4:11-cv-4106 (W.D. Ark. Mar. 19, 2013)

Citing Cases

Aery v. Collins

However, even assuming Aery properly exhausted the first step of the DOCgrievance procedure by following the…