Opinion
Case No. 6:04-cv-1595-Orl-22DAB.
April 21, 2006
ORDER
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:
MOTION: MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT DISCLOSURE OF ECONOMIST HENRY H. FISHKIND, Ph.D. (Doc. No. 65)
FILED: April 17, 2006 THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.
The Motion to Strike is DENIED, but Plaintiff will not be able to use this witness as part of his case in chief and his testimony will be strictly limited to rebuttal. Defendants may depose him after the discovery deadline (if need be). Plaintiff is admonished that the time for designating a rebuttal witness should have been set forth in the Case Management Report or sought by leave of Court, rather than by merely producing the report.
DONE and ORDERED.